ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多群体普遍性理论×多组验证性因子分析 (MG-CFA)×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1963–20011971
提出者Lee J. Cronbach and colleagues (Cronbach, Gleser, Nanda, Rajaratnam), extended to multi-group contexts by Brennan and othersKarl Jöreskog
类型Variance component / reliability generalizationMeasurement model / invariance test
开创性文献Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability Theory. Springer. ISBN: 978-0387952826Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗
别名MG G-theory, multi-group G-theory, generalizability theory across groups, cross-group G-studyMG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA
相关66
摘要Multi-group generalizability theory (MG G-theory) extends classical generalizability theory to estimate and compare variance components — attributable to persons, items, raters, occasions, and their interactions — simultaneously across two or more defined groups. It reveals whether a measurement procedure is equally reliable and generalizable for every group studied, supporting fair and equitable score interpretation.Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multi-group Generalizability Theory · Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare