方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 多群体区分效度评估× | 判别效度× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 1981 (foundational criterion); multi-group extension 1990s–2000s | 1959 |
| 提出者≠ | Fornell & Larcker (for the AVE-based criterion); extended to multi-group settings by the SEM invariance literature | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| 类型≠ | Validity assessment / model comparison | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| 开创性文献≠ | Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | cross-group discriminant validity, multi-sample discriminant validity, MGDV, discriminant validity across groups | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Multi-group discriminant validity assessment tests whether constructs measured by a scale are empirically distinct not just in one sample but consistently across two or more groups (e.g., cultures, genders, age cohorts). It extends standard discriminant validity criteria — such as the AVE rule and the HTMT ratio — into a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis framework to verify that conceptual distinctness is replicable across subpopulations. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|