ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

多群体区分效度评估×聚合效度×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1981 (foundational criterion); multi-group extension 1990s–2000s1959
提出者Fornell & Larcker (for the AVE-based criterion); extended to multi-group settings by the SEM invariance literatureDonald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske
类型Validity assessment / model comparisonValidity evidence / construct validation
开创性文献Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
别名cross-group discriminant validity, multi-sample discriminant validity, MGDV, discriminant validity across groupsconvergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity
相关54
摘要Multi-group discriminant validity assessment tests whether constructs measured by a scale are empirically distinct not just in one sample but consistently across two or more groups (e.g., cultures, genders, age cohorts). It extends standard discriminant validity criteria — such as the AVE rule and the HTMT ratio — into a multi-group confirmatory factor analysis framework to verify that conceptual distinctness is replicable across subpopulations.Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Multi-group discriminant validity · Convergent Validity. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare