方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 多组验证性因子分析 (MG-CFA)× | 验证性因子分析（CFA）× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 1971 | 1969 |
| 提出者≠ | Karl Jöreskog | Karl Gustav Jöreskog |
| 类型≠ | Measurement model / invariance test | Hypothesis-testing latent variable model |
| 开创性文献≠ | Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ | Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183–202. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | MG-CFA, multi-group CFA, measurement invariance testing, multi-sample CFA | CFA, confirmatory FA, measurement model, restricted factor analysis |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis tests whether a measurement model holds equivalently across two or more groups — such as cultures, genders, or time points. By imposing increasingly stringent equality constraints and comparing model fit, it determines whether comparisons of latent mean scores are justified. | Confirmatory factor analysis tests a researcher-specified factor structure against observed data. Unlike exploratory approaches, the researcher decides in advance which indicators load on which latent factor, and the model is evaluated by how closely the implied covariance matrix reproduces the sample covariance matrix. CFA is central to scale validation, construct validity assessment, and measurement invariance testing. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|