ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

改进的PSI方法用于客观赋权(改进的偏好选择指数赋权)×加法比率评估×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20102010
提出者Maniya, K., Bhatt, M. G.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
类型Modified PSI variance-based objective weighting (weight extraction from PSI preference variation)Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
开创性文献Maniya, K., Bhatt, M. G. (2010). A selection of material using a novel type decision-making method: Preference selection index method. Materials & Design DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
别名
相关88
摘要MPSI (Modified PSI method for objective weighting (Modified Preference Selection Index weighting)) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Maniya, K., Bhatt, M. G. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: MPSI · ARAS. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare