方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 基于元回归的共词分析× | 科学制图× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 科学计量学 | 文献计量学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2000s–2010s (hybrid application period) | 2000s |
| 提出者≠ | Derived from Callon et al. (co-word analysis, 1983) and Glass (meta-regression lineage, 1976); hybrid application developed incrementally in scientometrics and evidence synthesis | Katy Börner, Chaomei Chen, and others |
| 类型≠ | Hybrid scientometric-statistical method | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191–235. DOI ↗ | Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179–255. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | MR-CWA, meta-regression co-word mapping, regression-weighted co-word analysis, co-word meta-regression | knowledge mapping, domain mapping, research landscape visualization |
| 相关≠ | 4 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Meta-regression-based co-word analysis is a hybrid scientometric technique that enriches traditional co-word mapping by weighting keyword co-occurrence networks with meta-regression-derived effect estimates. Instead of treating all documents as equally informative, the method uses statistical regression to incorporate study-level moderators — such as publication year, sample size, or methodological quality — into the co-occurrence structure, revealing how thematic clusters in a research field vary across moderator conditions. | Science mapping is a bibliometric visualization method that creates visual representations of research domains, showing the structure, development, and relationships of scientific fields. Using bibliographic data (citations, keywords, authors, journals), science mapping algorithms generate network diagrams where nodes represent documents, concepts, or authors and edges represent relationships (citation, collaboration, semantic similarity). The resulting maps make invisible intellectual structures visible, enabling researchers to understand field topology, identify emerging areas, and navigate disciplinary landscapes. Pioneered by Börner, Chen, and Boyack in the 2000s, science mapping has become a standard tool in research evaluation and strategic planning. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|