方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 荟萃分析性III期临床试验× | 网络荟萃分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 流行病学 | 证据综合 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1976 (meta-analysis); systematic application to Phase III RCTs from 1990s onward | 2002 |
| 提出者≠ | Glass, G. V. (meta-analysis formalized); applied to Phase III trials via Cochrane Collaboration (Chalmers, Altman, Higgins) | Lumley (2002) |
| 类型≠ | Systematic quantitative evidence synthesis | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Whitehead, A. (2002). Meta-Analysis of Controlled Clinical Trials. Wiley. ISBN: 978-0471983705 | Lumley, T. (2002). Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Statistics in Medicine, 21(16), 2313–2324. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | Phase III meta-analysis, pooled Phase III analysis, systematic review of Phase III RCTs, confirmatory meta-analysis | Mixed Treatment Comparison, MTC, Indirect Comparison Meta-Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 3 | 1 |
| 摘要≠ | A meta-analytic Phase III clinical trial is a systematic, quantitative synthesis of multiple Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the same intervention. By pooling confirmatory trial data under a pre-registered protocol, the approach yields more precise effect estimates, resolves conflicting findings across trials, and supports regulatory or clinical guideline decisions with the highest level of evidence available in the evidence hierarchy. | Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a systematic method for comparing multiple interventions simultaneously within a single analytical framework, incorporating both direct evidence (head-to-head trials) and indirect evidence (comparisons via common comparators). First formalized by Lumley in 2002, NMA allows researchers to rank treatments and quantify comparative effectiveness even when some treatment pairs have never been directly studied. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|