ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

荟萃分析生态学研究×多层模型×
领域流行病学研究统计学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1990s1992
提出者Morgenstern, Blettner, and colleagues in epidemiology methodologyAnthony Bryk and Stephen Raudenbush
类型Quantitative synthesis designMethod
开创性文献Blettner, M., Sauerbrei, W., Schlehofer, B., Scheuchenpflug, T., & Friedenreich, C. (1999). Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology. International Journal of Epidemiology, 28(1), 1–9. DOI ↗Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. SAGE Publications. DOI ↗
别名ecological meta-analysis, aggregate-level meta-analysis, meta-analytic ecologic design, population-level meta-analysisHLM, mixed-effects models, random effects models, MLM
相关23
摘要A meta-analytic ecological study synthesises data from multiple populations or geographic units — rather than from individual patients — to estimate associations between exposures and health outcomes. By pooling aggregate-level statistics across studies or regions, it extends the reach of ecological reasoning to a wider evidence base, enabling detection of exposure-outcome relationships that single-population ecological analyses may miss due to limited variability or sample size.Multilevel modeling (also called hierarchical linear modeling, mixed-effects modeling) is a statistical framework for analyzing data organized in nested or clustered structures—students within schools, patients within hospitals, repeated measures within individuals. Developed by Bryk and Raudenbush (1992), it accounts for dependency among observations and partitions variance into levels (within-cluster and between-cluster), enabling valid inference and revealing context effects. Essential in education, medicine, organizational research, and any field where data have natural hierarchies.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Meta-analytic Ecological Study · Multilevel Modeling. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare