ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于标准移除效应的方法×加法比率评估×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20212010
提出者Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., Turskis, Z.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
类型Removal-effect objective weighting (logarithmic utility)Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
开创性文献Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., Turskis, Z. (2021). Determination of objective weights using a new method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC). Informatica DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
别名
相关88
摘要MEREC (MEthod based on the Removal Effects of Criteria) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Antucheviciene, J., Turskis, Z. in 2021. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: MEREC · ARAS. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare