ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Matthews Correlation Coefficient×平衡准确率×精确率×
领域模型评估模型评估模型评估
方法族MCDMMCDMMCDM
起源年份1975201020th century
提出者Brian W. MatthewsBrodersen, Ong, Stephan, and BuhmannHistorical statistical foundations
类型Evaluation metricEvaluation metricEvaluation metric
开创性文献Matthews, B. W. (1975). Comparison of predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Protein Structure, 405(2), 442-451. DOI ↗Brodersen, K. H., Ong, C. S., Stephan, K. E., & Buhmann, J. M. (2010). The balanced accuracy and its posterior distribution. 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 3121-3124. DOI ↗Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861-874. DOI ↗
别名Phi Coefficient, Binary Classification CorrelationAverage Recall, Equal-weight Average SensitivityPositive Predictive Value, PPV
相关555
摘要The Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) is a correlation measure between predicted and actual binary classifications. It ranges from -1 to 1 and is considered one of the most reliable single-score metrics for evaluating binary classifiers, especially on imbalanced datasets.Balanced accuracy is the average of recall values computed for each class separately. It corrects for class imbalance by giving equal weight to the performance on each class, regardless of class frequency in the dataset.Precision measures the proportion of positive predictions that were actually correct. It answers the question: 'Of all the cases we predicted as positive, how many were truly positive?' Precision is critical in scenarios where false positives are costly.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Matthews Correlation Coefficient · Balanced Accuracy · Precision. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare