ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

匹配筛查试验评估×病例对照研究×
领域流行病学流行病学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1980s–2000s (formalized alongside diagnostic accuracy methodology)1950s (formal methodology); precursors in the 1920s
提出者Methodological synthesis from matched case-control and diagnostic accuracy traditions (Pepe, Zhou, and others)Janet Lane-Claypon (early precursors, 1926); formalized by Brian MacMahon and Jerome Cornfield in the 1950s–1960s
类型Observational diagnostic study with matched designObservational analytic study design
开创性文献Pepe, M. S. (2003). The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0198509844Schlesselman, J.J. (1982). Case-Control Studies: Design, Conduct, Analysis. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195027860
别名matched diagnostic accuracy study, paired screening evaluation, matched-pair test performance study, matched screening assessmentcase-referent study, case-control design, retrospective case-control, case-control analysis
相关66
摘要Matched screening test evaluation assesses the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of a screening or diagnostic test using a matched design, in which disease-positive cases are paired with one or more disease-free controls selected to share key characteristics such as age, sex, or clinical setting. Matching controls for confounders before measuring test performance produces more precise and less biased estimates of diagnostic accuracy, and enables direct paired comparisons of competing tests within the same subjects.A case-control study is a retrospective observational design in which individuals who have developed a disease or outcome of interest (cases) are compared with individuals who have not (controls) to determine whether prior exposure to a putative risk factor differs between the two groups. The primary measure of association is the odds ratio, which approximates the relative risk when the outcome is rare. Case-control studies are especially efficient for investigating rare diseases and generating etiological hypotheses.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Matched Screening Test Evaluation · Case-control study. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare