方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 匹配生态研究× | 匹配病例对照研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 流行病学 | 流行病学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1970s–1990s (methodological consolidation) | 1950s–1970s |
| 提出者≠ | Extension of classical ecological study design; matching principles formalized in 20th-century epidemiology | Brian MacMahon and others; systematised by Schlesselman (1982) |
| 类型≠ | Observational study design | Observational analytic design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Morgenstern, H. (1998). Ecologic studies in epidemiology: Concepts, principles, and methods. Annual Review of Public Health, 16, 61–81. link ↗ | Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755474 |
| 别名 | matched ecologic study, geographically matched ecological study, area-matched ecological design, matched aggregate study | matched case-referent study, individually matched case-control, pair-matched case-control, matched case-control design |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | A matched ecological study is an observational epidemiological design in which aggregate units — such as geographic areas, communities, or time periods — are systematically paired or matched on key characteristics before comparing exposure and outcome rates. Matching at the group level controls for area-level confounders and improves comparability between exposed and unexposed units, producing more credible estimates of ecological associations than an unmatched counterpart. | A matched case-control study is an observational epidemiological design in which each case (a person with the disease or outcome of interest) is paired with one or more controls (persons without the outcome) who share one or more characteristics — such as age, sex, or clinical setting — to control confounding. Exposure history is then compared between cases and their matched controls to estimate the odds ratio of the exposure-disease association. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|