ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

纵向 nomological 效度×nomological validity×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1955 (concept); longitudinal extension 1990s–2000s1955
提出者Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept, 1955); longitudinal extension developed in organizational and personality research from the 1990s onwardLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
类型Validity evaluationValidity evidence framework
开创性文献Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
别名longitudinal construct validity, nomological network validation across time, longitudinal criterion-related validity, temporal nomological validitynomological network validity, construct network validity, nomological web validity
相关66
摘要Longitudinal nomological validity evaluates whether a construct's theoretically predicted relationships with other constructs hold consistently across multiple measurement occasions. It extends the nomological network framework of Cronbach and Meehl (1955) to longitudinal designs, testing whether a scale behaves as theory demands not only at a single time point but over time.Nomological validity evaluates whether a construct behaves as theory predicts within a broader network of related constructs. It is not a single statistical test but an accumulation of evidence that the measure fits coherently into a web of theoretically grounded relationships — demonstrating that what is measured is what the theory says it should measure.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Longitudinal Nomological Validity · Nomological Validity. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare