方法对比

	纵向 nomological 效度	纵向验证性因子分析
领域	心理测量学	心理测量学
方法族	Latent structure	Latent structure
起源年份	1955 (concept); longitudinal extension 1990s–2000s	1970s–1990s
提出者	Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept, 1955); longitudinal extension developed in organizational and personality research from the 1990s onward	Karl Jöreskog (CFA framework); longitudinal extension by Wheaton, Muthén, and Alwin in the 1970s–1990s
类型	Validity evaluation	Longitudinal latent variable / measurement model
开创性文献	Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.	Widaman, K. F. & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research (pp. 281–324). American Psychological Association.
别名	longitudinal construct validity, nomological network validation across time, longitudinal criterion-related validity, temporal nomological validity	longitudinal CFA, repeated-measures CFA, longitudinal measurement model, panel CFA
相关	6	6
摘要	Longitudinal nomological validity evaluates whether a construct's theoretically predicted relationships with other constructs hold consistently across multiple measurement occasions. It extends the nomological network framework of Cronbach and Meehl (1955) to longitudinal designs, testing whether a scale behaves as theory demands not only at a single time point but over time.	Longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis (longitudinal CFA) applies a theoretically specified measurement model to data collected at two or more time points. Its primary purpose is to verify that a scale measures the same latent construct in the same way over time — a prerequisite for drawing valid conclusions about change from repeated-measures data.