方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 纵向聚合效度× | 构念效度× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 1997–2003 | 1955 |
| 提出者≠ | Cole & Maxwell; Widaman & Reise | Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl |
| 类型≠ | Validity evidence framework | Validity evaluation framework |
| 开创性文献≠ | Cole, D. A. & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577. DOI ↗ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | longitudinal construct validity, repeated-measure convergent validity, cross-time convergent validity, temporal convergent validity | construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Longitudinal convergent validity evaluates whether a scale's indicators correlate with theoretically related constructs not just at a single time point but consistently across repeated measurement occasions. It extends standard convergent validity testing into longitudinal designs to ensure that the scale measures the intended construct in the same meaningful way over time. | Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|