ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

纵向聚合效度×构念效度×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1997–20031955
提出者Cole & Maxwell; Widaman & ReiseLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
类型Validity evidence frameworkValidity evaluation framework
开创性文献Cole, D. A. & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577. DOI ↗Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
别名longitudinal construct validity, repeated-measure convergent validity, cross-time convergent validity, temporal convergent validityconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
相关66
摘要Longitudinal convergent validity evaluates whether a scale's indicators correlate with theoretically related constructs not just at a single time point but consistently across repeated measurement occasions. It extends standard convergent validity testing into longitudinal designs to ensure that the scale measures the intended construct in the same meaningful way over time.Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Longitudinal convergent validity · Construct Validity. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare