ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

准则重要性对数分解法×自动成对线性排序组合×加法比率评估×
领域决策决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDMMCDM
起源年份202420202010
提出者Pala, O.Konstantinos, N., Xenakis, A., Kehagias, A.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
类型Objective weighting via logarithmic decompositionPairwise dominance aggregation (automatic combination)Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
开创性文献Pala, O. (2024). Assessment of the social progress on European Union by logarithmic decomposition of criteria importance. Expert Systems With Applications DOI ↗Konstantinos, N., Xenakis, A., Kehagias, A. (2020). APLOCO: A linear programming-based multicriteria ranking method that handles dependent criteria and criteria groups. Operational Research link ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
别名
相关888
摘要LODECI (LOgarithmic DEcomposition of Criteria Importance) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pala, O. in 2024. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.APLOCO (Automatic Pairwise Linear Order Combination) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Konstantinos, N., Xenakis, A., Kehagias, A. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: LODECI · APLOCO · ARAS. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare