ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

线性最大值归一化×加法比率评估×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份19672010
提出者Fishburn, P. C.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
类型Normalization (linear-max, ratio-based)Additive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
开创性文献Fishburn, P. C. (1967). Additive Utilities with Incomplete Product Sets: Application to Priorities and Assignments. Operations Research DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
别名
相关48
摘要LINEAR-MAX-NORMALIZATION (Linear Max Normalization — division by column maximum (benefit) or column minimum over value (cost)) is a normalization multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Fishburn, P. C. in 1967. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: LINEAR-MAX-NORMALIZATION · ARAS. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare