ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于陆标的条件生存与动态预测分析×Kaplan-Meier生存估计量×
领域生存分析生存分析
方法族Survival analysisSurvival analysis
起源年份19831958
提出者Anderson, J. R., Cain, K. C. & Gelber, R. D.Kaplan, E. L. & Meier, P.
类型Conditional survival estimatorNon-parametric survival estimator
开创性文献Anderson, J. R., Cain, K. C. & Gelber, R. D. (1983). Analysis of Survival by Tumor Response. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1(11), 710–719. DOI ↗Kaplan, E. L. & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(282), 457–481. DOI ↗
别名landmark method, dynamic prediction, conditional survival estimation, Landmark Analizi (Dinamik Tahmin)product-limit estimator, km curve, kaplan-meier sağkalım analizi
相关32
摘要Landmark analysis, introduced by Anderson, Cain, and Gelber in 1983, estimates conditional survival probabilities for subjects who are still at risk at a pre-specified point in time — the landmark — rather than at study entry. It was developed explicitly to avoid immortal time bias that arises when subjects are grouped by an event (such as a treatment change or biomarker result) that can only occur if they remain event-free long enough to experience it.The Kaplan-Meier estimator, introduced by Kaplan and Meier in 1958, is a non-parametric method that estimates the survival curve — the probability of remaining event-free over time — from right-censored time-to-event data. The log-rank test is the companion procedure used to compare survival curves between groups.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v2
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Landmark Analysis · Kaplan-Meier. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare