ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

教育研究中的中断时间序列分析×双重差分法 (Diff-in-Diff)×
领域因果推断计量经济学
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份1979-20021994
提出者Shadish, Cook & Campbell (quasi-experimental design); Wagner et al. (segmented regression formalization)Card & Krueger (canonical 1994 application); Angrist & Pischke (textbook treatment)
类型Quasi-experimental causal inferenceCausal inference / panel regression
开创性文献Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin. ISBN: 978-0395615560Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978-0691120355
别名ITS in education, educational ITS, segmented regression in education, policy interrupted time seriesdiff-in-diff, DiD, Farkların Farkı (Diff-in-Diff)
相关45
摘要Interrupted time series (ITS) analysis is a quasi-experimental design that estimates the causal effect of an education policy or intervention by examining whether an outcome trend changes abruptly at the point of implementation. Applied to education, it is used to evaluate reforms, curriculum changes, testing policies, and school interventions using routinely collected longitudinal data without a randomised control group.Difference-in-Differences is a causal-inference method that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing how a treatment group and a control group change over time. Made famous by Card and Krueger's 1994 minimum-wage study and developed in Angrist and Pischke's Mostly Harmless Econometrics, it isolates the treatment effect as the difference between the two groups' before-after changes.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Interrupted Time Series in Education Research · Difference-in-Differences. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare