ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

异质性处理效应敏感性分析×双重稳健估计(AIPW)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份2000s–2010s2005
提出者Rosenbaum (sensitivity analysis framework); extended to heterogeneous effects by Crump, Imbens, and othersRobins & Rotnitzky; Bang & Robins
类型Robustness / sensitivity checkSemiparametric causal estimator
开创性文献Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679Robins, J. M. & Rotnitzky, A. (1995). Semiparametric Efficiency in Multivariate Regression Models with Missing Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(429), 122-129. DOI ↗
别名HTE sensitivity analysis, heterogeneous-effects sensitivity analysis, sensitivity analysis with effect heterogeneity, HTE robustness analysisAIPW, augmented inverse probability weighting, doubly robust estimator, Çift Gürbüz Kestirici (Augmented IPW / AIPW)
相关55
摘要Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Sensitivity Analysis examines how robust subgroup-specific causal estimates are to unobserved confounding. Rather than testing a single average treatment effect, it asks whether the estimated variation in treatment effects across units or subgroups could be explained away by hidden bias, and at what level of hidden bias the causal conclusions for each subgroup would break down.Doubly Robust Estimation, also called Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW), is a semiparametric method for estimating causal treatment effects that combines an outcome regression model with a propensity (treatment) model. Developed in the work of Robins & Rotnitzky (1995) and Bang & Robins (2005), it stays consistent as long as at least one of the two models is correctly specified.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Sensitivity Analysis for Causality · Doubly Robust Estimation. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare