方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 异质性处理效应敏感性分析× | 双重差分法 (Diff-in-Diff)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 因果推断 | 计量经济学 |
| 方法族 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 起源年份≠ | 2000s–2010s | 1994 |
| 提出者≠ | Rosenbaum (sensitivity analysis framework); extended to heterogeneous effects by Crump, Imbens, and others | Card & Krueger (canonical 1994 application); Angrist & Pischke (textbook treatment) |
| 类型≠ | Robustness / sensitivity check | Causal inference / panel regression |
| 开创性文献≠ | Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679 | Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978-0691120355 |
| 别名≠ | HTE sensitivity analysis, heterogeneous-effects sensitivity analysis, sensitivity analysis with effect heterogeneity, HTE robustness analysis | diff-in-diff, DiD, Farkların Farkı (Diff-in-Diff) |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Sensitivity Analysis examines how robust subgroup-specific causal estimates are to unobserved confounding. Rather than testing a single average treatment effect, it asks whether the estimated variation in treatment effects across units or subgroups could be explained away by hidden bias, and at what level of hidden bias the causal conclusions for each subgroup would break down. | Difference-in-Differences is a causal-inference method that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing how a treatment group and a control group change over time. Made famous by Card and Krueger's 1994 minimum-wage study and developed in Angrist and Pischke's Mostly Harmless Econometrics, it isolates the treatment effect as the difference between the two groups' before-after changes. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|