方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 健康应用系统可用性量表× | 远程医疗满意度量表× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 卫生信息学 | 卫生信息学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1996 | 2009 |
| 提出者≠ | John Brooke | Multiple researchers; consensus measure |
| 类型 | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| 开创性文献≠ | Brooke, J. (1996). SUS—A quick and dirty usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Weerdmeester, A. Thomas, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor & Francis. ISBN: 978-0-7484-0635-1 | Or, Z., & Kartak, F. (2009). Review of the empirical literature on telemedicine in the OECD countries: Does telemedicine improve outcomes? In M. Rechel, B. Goddard (Eds.), Improving healthcare quality in Europe. WHO Regional Office for Europe. link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | SUS-Health, System Usability Scale, SUS | TSS, Telemedicine Satisfaction |
| 相关 | 3 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a rapid, validated tool for measuring perceived usability of digital products, widely adapted for health applications. Developed by John Brooke in 1996 and extensively validated by Bangor and colleagues, the 10-item SUS generates a single composite score reflecting users' subjective perception of ease of use, learnability, and overall system quality. Its simplicity and robustness have made it the de facto standard for usability assessment in health technology research. | The Telemedicine Satisfaction Scale measures patient satisfaction with remote clinical encounters, assessing perceptions of communication quality, technical usability, provider competence, and perceived benefit. While no single universal scale dominates the literature, core satisfaction domains—connection quality, provider accessibility, clinical effectiveness, and likelihood to recommend—are consistently measured across telemedicine studies to evaluate user acceptance and identify barriers to adoption. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|