ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Hatemi-J 非对称因果检验×Toda-Yamamoto Granger 因果检验×
领域计量经济学计量经济学
方法族Hypothesis testHypothesis test
起源年份20121995
提出者Abdulnasser Hatemi-JHiro Toda & Taku Yamamoto
类型Nonlinear Granger causality testModified Wald test on augmented VAR
开创性文献Hatemi-J, A. (2012). Asymmetric causality tests with an application. Empirical Economics, 43(1), 447–456. DOI ↗Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1–2), 225–250. DOI ↗
别名Hatemi-J Asymmetric Causality Test, Asymmetric Causality Test, Positive and Negative Causality Test, Asimetrik Nedensellik TestiTY Causality Test, Modified Wald Granger Causality, MWALD Test, Toda-Yamamoto Nedensellik Testi
相关33
摘要The Hatemi-J asymmetric causality test, introduced by Abdulnasser Hatemi-J in 2012, extends the Granger causality framework to allow causal relationships between the positive and negative components of integrated time series to differ. By decomposing each series into cumulative positive and negative partial sums and embedding the Toda-Yamamoto approach within a VAR, the test enables researchers to distinguish whether positive shocks, negative shocks, or both drive causation between economic variables.The Toda-Yamamoto (TY) causality test, introduced by Toda and Yamamoto (1995), provides a robust procedure for testing Granger non-causality in vector autoregressive (VAR) models when the variables may be integrated or cointegrated of arbitrary order. By intentionally over-fitting the VAR with extra lags equal to the maximum integration order, the method bypasses the need for pre-testing cointegration and preserves the standard asymptotic chi-squared distribution of the Wald statistic.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Hatemi-J Asymmetric Causality · Toda-Yamamoto Causality. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare