ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

格拉斯哥-布莱奇福德评分×Wells DVT评分×
领域临床评估临床评估
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20001994
提出者O. Blatchford, W. R. Murray, et al.Philip S. Wells
类型Gastrointestinal bleeding risk stratificationVenous thromboembolism risk stratification
开创性文献Blatchford, O., Murray, W. R., & Blatchford, M. (2000). A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet, 356(9238), 1318-1321. link ↗Wells, P. S., Hirsh, J., Anderson, D. R., et al. (1994). A simple clinical model for the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis combined with impedance plethysmography. Archives of Internal Medicine, 154(13), 1541-1546. link ↗
别名GBS, Blatchford score, GI bleeding riskWells DVT Score, DVT Wells
相关33
摘要The Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), developed by Blatchford et al. in 2000, is a 23-point risk stratification tool for predicting the need for intervention (transfusion, endoscopic therapy, surgery) in patients presenting with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. It integrates clinical and laboratory data to identify low-risk patients who may be candidates for outpatient or non-interventional management.The Wells score, developed by Wells et al. in 1994, is a clinical prediction rule that stratifies patients into low, intermediate, or high pretest probability of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). It combines seven clinical features to guide diagnostic testing decisions and reduce unnecessary imaging in suspected DVT patients.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Glasgow-Blatchford Score · Wells Score for DVT. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare