ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

全一致法×加法比率评估×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20182010
提出者Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Sremac, S.Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z.
类型Pairwise priority + consistency constraint LP weightingAdditive utility ratio (optimal reference row)
开创性文献Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Sremac, S. (2018). A new model for determining weight coefficients of criteria in MCDM models: Full consistency method (FUCOM). Symmetry DOI ↗Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy link ↗
别名
相关88
摘要FUCOM (Full Consistency Method) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Sremac, S. in 2018. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. in 2010. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: FUCOM · ARAS. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare