方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| Framing Effects Experiment× | Elaboration Likelihood Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | Communication | Communication |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1987 | 1986 |
| 提出者≠ | Iyengar & Kinder (effects tradition); Chong & Druckman (synthesis) | Richard Petty & John Cacioppo |
| 类型≠ | Randomized experiment isolating the causal effect of message frames on attitudes | Dual-process experimental analysis of attitude change |
| 开创性文献≠ | Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 9780226388571 | Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Communication and Persuasion (pp. 1–24). New York: Springer. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | Framing experiment, Message framing experiment, Equivalence and emphasis framing experiment, Çerçeveleme Etkisi Deneyi | ELM analysis, Dual-process persuasion experiment, Central and peripheral route analysis, Ayrıntılandırma Olasılığı Modeli Analizi |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | A framing effects experiment is a randomized design that isolates the causal impact of how a message is framed — which considerations it emphasizes — on people's attitudes, judgments, or behavior. By randomly assigning participants to read otherwise comparable messages that differ only in their frame, it provides the causal counterpart to the descriptive framing analysis of media content. | Elaboration likelihood analysis applies Petty and Cacioppo's 1986 Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) to study persuasion through experiments that cross message argument quality with peripheral cues under varying levels of audience motivation and ability to think. It identifies whether attitude change travels the central route — effortful scrutiny of arguments — or the peripheral route, reliance on simple cues like source attractiveness or message length. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|