ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

森林火灾风险评估×冠层覆盖度估算×
领域林学林学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1950s–2000s2000s
提出者Van Wagner, Rothermel, and fire ecology research communityJennings, Brown, Sheil, and colleagues
类型Assessment and modeling pipelineMeasurement and estimation pipeline
开创性文献Agee, J. K. (2000). The Ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests. Island Press. link ↗Jennings, S. B., Brown, N. D., & Sheil, D. (2000). Assessing Forest Canopies and Understorey Illumination: Methods and Applications. Forest Ecology and Management, 129(1-3), 219–243. link ↗
别名Wildfire risk assessment, Fire hazard mapping, Burn severity predictionCanopy closure measurement, Crown cover estimation, Overstory density assessment
相关44
摘要Forest fire risk assessment quantifies the probability and potential severity of wildfire in forest ecosystems, integrating stand structure, fuel characteristics, weather patterns, and topography. Developed by Van Wagner, Rothermel, and fire science communities, fire risk models predict fire ignition likelihood, fire behavior (spread rate, intensity), and consequences (area burned, damage extent). Essential for land management planning, community protection, and ecosystem conservation.Canopy cover, or canopy closure, is the proportion of ground area covered by tree crowns when viewed from above, typically expressed as a percentage. Formalized by Jennings and colleagues in pioneering work on tropical forest structure, canopy cover estimation employs multiple methods—from field-based ocular assessment to sophisticated remote sensing and terrestrial LiDAR—providing essential data on forest structure, light availability, and habitat characteristics relevant to ecology, silviculture, and climate research.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 4 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Forest Fire Risk Assessment · Canopy Cover Estimation. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare