ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

焦点小组法×深度访谈法×
领域质性研究质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19561954
提出者Robert K. Merton and Paul F. LazarsfeldCarl Rogers and Herbert H. Hyman
类型MethodMethod
开创性文献Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803954366Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0761908631
别名FGD, focus group discussion, group interviewIDI, qualitative interview, one-on-one interview, in-depth interviewing
相关45
摘要Focus group discussions are a qualitative research method in which a trained moderator guides a small group (typically 6–12 participants) through structured or semi-structured discussion of a specific topic or product. Developed by Merton and Lazarsfeld in the 1950s for market research, focus groups are now widely used in health sciences, education, social sciences, and policy research. The method leverages group interaction to generate rich, contextual insights that individual interviews may not reveal.In-depth interviews are a qualitative research method in which a trained interviewer conducts one-on-one conversations with individual participants using open-ended questions to explore their experiences, perspectives, and understandings of a phenomenon. Developed in the 1950s by Rogers and Hyman, the method varies along a spectrum from structured (standardized question sets) to semi-structured (guided topic areas with flexibility) to unstructured (emergent, conversational). In-depth interviews are widely used in sociology, psychology, health sciences, anthropology, and organizational research to capture rich, detailed narratives and personal meaning.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 4 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Focus Group Methodology · In-Depth Interview Method. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare