方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 现场式民族志× | 基于现场的数字民族志× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2010s–present | 2000s–2010s |
| 提出者≠ | Robert V. Kozinets (netnography); hybrid extension developed in netnographic scholarship | Christine Hine; Sarah Pink et al. |
| 类型 | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Kozinets, R. V. (2020). Netnography: The Essential Guide to Qualitative Social Media Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 9781526458162 | Hine, C. (2000). Virtual Ethnography. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761958956 |
| 别名 | hybrid netnography, field netnography, offline-online netnography, blended netnography | connective ethnography, blended digital ethnography, hybrid online-offline ethnography, field-integrated digital ethnography |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Field-based netnography combines the systematic online community observation of netnography with direct in-person fieldwork. Researchers move between digital spaces and physical sites where the same community or practice exists, triangulating online discourse with face-to-face encounters. This approach is particularly suited to communities whose identity and practices span both online and offline worlds — fan communities, patient groups, activist networks, and professional subcultures, among others. | Field-based digital ethnography is a qualitative research design that combines traditional in-person fieldwork with systematic collection and analysis of digital data. Rather than studying online communities in isolation, it traces how social life moves between physical settings and digital spaces, treating both as equally real sites of cultural practice. Rooted in Christine Hine's virtual ethnography and Sarah Pink's digital ethnography principles, it is particularly suited to studying communities whose practices span offline and online worlds. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|