方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 基于场域的隐喻分析× | 主题分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 质性 | 质性研究 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1990s–2000s (field-based applications) | 2006 |
| 提出者≠ | Rooted in Lakoff & Johnson (1980); field-based application developed across educational and social science research from the 1990s onward | Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative analytic method | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013 | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | field metaphor elicitation, naturalistic metaphor analysis, contextual metaphor analysis, FbMA | TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | Field-based metaphor analysis is a qualitative method that collects and interprets spontaneous or elicited metaphors from participants in their natural settings. Grounded in Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory, it reveals how individuals and communities structure abstract concepts — such as teaching, leadership, or illness — through figurative language encountered or produced in real contexts. Unlike purely document-based metaphor studies, field-based variants combine data collection in natural field settings with systematic analytic coding. | Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|