ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于场域的隐喻分析×内容分析×
领域质性质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1990s–2000s (field-based applications)Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 2018
提出者Rooted in Lakoff & Johnson (1980); field-based application developed across educational and social science research from the 1990s onwardKlaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications research
类型Qualitative analytic methodQualitative / mixed-method research technique
开创性文献Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661
别名field metaphor elicitation, naturalistic metaphor analysis, contextual metaphor analysis, FbMAİçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysis
相关55
摘要Field-based metaphor analysis is a qualitative method that collects and interprets spontaneous or elicited metaphors from participants in their natural settings. Grounded in Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory, it reveals how individuals and communities structure abstract concepts — such as teaching, leadership, or illness — through figurative language encountered or produced in real contexts. Unlike purely document-based metaphor studies, field-based variants combine data collection in natural field settings with systematic analytic coding.Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Field-based Metaphor Analysis · Content Analysis. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare