ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于现场的偏离案例抽样×目的性抽样×
领域调查方法论调查方法论
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1980s–1990s (purposive/deviant case sampling literature)Formalized ~1980–1990
提出者Michael Quinn Patton; Yvonna Lincoln & Egon GubaMichael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry
类型Purposive qualitative sampling strategyNon-probability sampling strategy
开创性文献Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796
别名field deviant case sampling, outlier case sampling in field research, extreme case sampling in fieldwork, in-situ deviant case samplingjudgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling
相关54
摘要Field-based deviant case sampling is a purposive strategy that deliberately selects cases deviating markedly from an established pattern or norm, with data collected through direct fieldwork — observation, in-situ interviews, and ethnographic engagement — in the participants' natural settings. By studying outliers on-site, researchers gain contextually grounded insight into why and how certain cases diverge from the typical pattern.Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Field-based Deviant Case Sampling · Purposive sampling. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare