方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 基于现场的偏离案例抽样× | 目的性抽样× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 调查方法论 | 调查方法论 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1980s–1990s (purposive/deviant case sampling literature) | Formalized ~1980–1990 |
| 提出者≠ | Michael Quinn Patton; Yvonna Lincoln & Egon Guba | Michael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry |
| 类型≠ | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy | Non-probability sampling strategy |
| 开创性文献≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711 | Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796 |
| 别名 | field deviant case sampling, outlier case sampling in field research, extreme case sampling in fieldwork, in-situ deviant case sampling | judgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Field-based deviant case sampling is a purposive strategy that deliberately selects cases deviating markedly from an established pattern or norm, with data collected through direct fieldwork — observation, in-situ interviews, and ethnographic engagement — in the participants' natural settings. By studying outliers on-site, researchers gain contextually grounded insight into why and how certain cases diverge from the typical pattern. | Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|