ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

基于现场的偏离案例抽样×最大变异抽样×
领域调查方法论调查方法论
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1980s–1990s (purposive/deviant case sampling literature)1985 (Lincoln & Guba); elaborated 1990–2002 (Patton)
提出者Michael Quinn Patton; Yvonna Lincoln & Egon GubaLincoln & Guba; systematised by Michael Quinn Patton
类型Purposive qualitative sampling strategyPurposive qualitative sampling strategy
开创性文献Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-0761919711Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage. Chapter 5: Purposeful Sampling. ISBN: 978-0761919711
别名field deviant case sampling, outlier case sampling in field research, extreme case sampling in fieldwork, in-situ deviant case samplingmaximum variation sampling, maximum diversity sampling, MVS, heterogeneous sampling
相关55
摘要Field-based deviant case sampling is a purposive strategy that deliberately selects cases deviating markedly from an established pattern or norm, with data collected through direct fieldwork — observation, in-situ interviews, and ethnographic engagement — in the participants' natural settings. By studying outliers on-site, researchers gain contextually grounded insight into why and how certain cases diverge from the typical pattern.Maximum variation sampling is a purposive qualitative sampling strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects cases that span the widest possible range of variation on dimensions central to the study. The goal is not statistical representation but the identification of common patterns that cut across diverse cases as well as the documentation of the unique ways each context shapes the phenomenon under investigation.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Field-based Deviant Case Sampling · Maximum Variation Sampling. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare