ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

因子关系赋权法×组合距离评估法×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20202016
提出者Žižović, M., Pamucar, D., Marinkovic, D., Žižović, M. M.Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J.
类型Weight_Subjective (pairwise factor relationship matrix, closed-form weights)Distance from anti-ideal (Euclidean + Taxicab)
开创性文献Žižović, M., Pamucar, D., Marinkovic, D., Žižović, M. M. (2020). Novel integrated multi-criteria ranking methodology: Case of public administration efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research link ↗Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. (2016). A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research link ↗
别名
相关88
摘要FARE (Factor Relationship weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Žižović, M., Pamucar, D., Marinkovic, D., Žižović, M. M. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CODAS (Combinative Distance-Based Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. in 2016. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: FARE · CODAS. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare