方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 面对面德尔菲技术× | 名义小组技术× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 调查方法论 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1950s–1963 | 1971 |
| 提出者≠ | Norman Dalkey and Olaf Helmer (RAND Corporation) | André L. Delbecq and Andrew H. Van de Ven |
| 类型≠ | Structured expert-consensus method | Qualitative research method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458–467. DOI ↗ | Delbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(4), 466–492. link ↗ |
| 别名 | in-person Delphi, face-to-face Delphi, conventional Delphi, FtF Delphi | NGT, structured group process, nominal group process, priority-setting group method |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | The face-to-face Delphi Technique is a structured, iterative consensus-building method conducted through in-person sessions with a purposively selected panel of experts. Across multiple rounds, panelists independently respond to structured questionnaires, receive aggregated group feedback, and revise their judgments until acceptable consensus is reached. The face-to-face format adds direct interpersonal interaction while preserving the anonymity of individual ratings within each round. | The Nominal Group Technique (NGT) is a structured group facilitation method designed to generate and prioritise ideas, problems, or solutions while ensuring equal participation from all members. Developed by Delbecq and Van de Ven in 1971, it combines silent individual idea generation with structured group discussion and systematic voting to produce a ranked list of priorities. Unlike unstructured focus groups, NGT prevents dominant voices from suppressing quieter participants, making it especially valuable for needs assessment, program planning, and stakeholder priority-setting in applied research and policy contexts. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|