ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

循证实践态度量表 (EBPAS-36)×组织变革实施准备度 (ORIC)×
领域实施科学实施科学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20052014
提出者Gregory A. Aarons, PhDChristopher M. Shea, PhD; Sarah R. Jacobs, PhD; Dean A. Esserman, PhD; and colleagues
类型Self-report questionnaireSelf-report organizational survey
开创性文献Aarons, G. A. (2011). Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale-50 (EBPAS-50) and EBPAS-36 short form: Psychometric properties. Implementation Science, 6(1), 89. link ↗Shea, C. M., Jacobs, S. R., Esserman, D. A., Wagner, S. L., & Kraemer, D. F. (2014). Organizational readiness for implementing change: A psychometric assessment of a new measure. Implementation Science, 9, 26. DOI ↗
别名EBPAS, EBPAS-36, Evidence-Based Practice AttitudeORIC, Organizational Readiness for Change, ORIC-12
相关55
摘要The EBPAS-36 is a 36-item self-report questionnaire that assesses clinicians' and organizational leaders' attitudes toward adopting and implementing evidence-based practices (EBP). Developed by Aarons in 2005 and refined through multiple validation studies, it measures four core dimensions: perceived requirements to adopt EBP, the appeal and usefulness of EBP to individual practice, organizational openness to innovation, and perceived divergence between current practice and EBP requirements. The EBPAS is widely used in healthcare, mental health, child welfare, and substance abuse treatment settings to predict adoption readiness and guide implementation planning.The Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) is a 12-item self-report measure that assesses organizational readiness to implement evidence-based practices and innovations. Developed by Shea and colleagues in 2014, the ORIC measures two critical dimensions of organizational readiness: Change Commitment (the extent to which staff and leadership are motivated and dedicated to implementing change) and Change Efficacy (the extent to which staff believe they have the capability and resources to successfully implement the change). The ORIC is grounded in implementation science theory and has demonstrated strong psychometric properties and predictive validity for implementation success across healthcare, mental health, and organizational settings.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: EBPAS-36 · ORIC. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare