方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 循证实践态度量表 (EBPAS-36)× | 实施领导力量表 (ILS)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 实施科学 | 实施科学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2005 | 2014 |
| 提出者≠ | Gregory A. Aarons, PhD | Gregory A. Aarons, PhD; Michelle G. Ehrhart, PhD; Lydia R. Farahnak, PhD |
| 类型 | Self-report questionnaire | Self-report questionnaire |
| 开创性文献≠ | Aarons, G. A. (2011). Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale-50 (EBPAS-50) and EBPAS-36 short form: Psychometric properties. Implementation Science, 6(1), 89. link ↗ | Aarons, G. A., Ehrhart, M. G., Farahnak, L. R., & Sklar, M. (2014). Aligning leadership across systems and organizations to develop integrated care. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 41(2), 159–178. link ↗ |
| 别名 | EBPAS, EBPAS-36, Evidence-Based Practice Attitude | ILS, Implementation Leadership, ILS-12 |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | The EBPAS-36 is a 36-item self-report questionnaire that assesses clinicians' and organizational leaders' attitudes toward adopting and implementing evidence-based practices (EBP). Developed by Aarons in 2005 and refined through multiple validation studies, it measures four core dimensions: perceived requirements to adopt EBP, the appeal and usefulness of EBP to individual practice, organizational openness to innovation, and perceived divergence between current practice and EBP requirements. The EBPAS is widely used in healthcare, mental health, child welfare, and substance abuse treatment settings to predict adoption readiness and guide implementation planning. | The Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS) is a 12-item self-report measure that assesses unit-level leadership behaviors critical to successful implementation of evidence-based practices and innovations. Developed by Aarons, Ehrhart, and Farahnak in 2014, the ILS measures four dimensions of implementation leadership: proactive leadership, knowledgeable leadership, supportive leadership, and perseverant leadership. This brief, validated instrument is designed to capture frontline leaders' (managers, supervisors, unit heads) implementation-specific behaviors as perceived by clinical staff, and is widely used in healthcare implementation research to evaluate leadership effectiveness and predict implementation success. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|