ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

面向评价的多层混合方法设计×项目评估×
领域研究设计田野方法
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2000s–2010s1960s–1970s (Scriven 1967; Stufflebeam CIPP model 1971)
提出者Donna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (systematization)Michael Scriven; Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi
类型Mixed methods evaluation designApplied evaluation methodology
开创性文献Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412975551Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761908944
别名multilevel mixed methods evaluation, hierarchical mixed methods evaluation, MLM mixed methods, nested mixed methods evaluationevaluation research, program assessment, educational evaluation, systematic program evaluation
相关23
摘要Evaluation-oriented multilevel mixed methods is a research design that combines quantitative and qualitative data across hierarchically nested levels of an organization or system — such as students within classrooms within schools — to evaluate a program, policy, or intervention. By capturing outcomes, processes, and contextual factors simultaneously at each level, this design produces richer evaluative inferences than either purely statistical multilevel models or single-level qualitative evaluations alone.Program evaluation is a systematic, empirically grounded process of collecting and analyzing information about a program to determine its merit, worth, or significance. Applied across education, public health, social services, and policy, it addresses questions such as whether a program is reaching its target population, whether it is being implemented as designed, and whether it is producing the intended outcomes. It draws on both quantitative and qualitative methods and serves accountability, improvement, or knowledge-generation purposes.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Evaluation-oriented multilevel mixed methods · Program Evaluation. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare