ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

等效性/非劣效性试验×交叉设计×
领域实验设计实验设计
方法族Hypothesis testHypothesis test
起源年份19871960
提出者Schuirmann, D.J. / EMA regulatory frameworkEarly formalized in clinical research literature; widely used since mid-20th century
类型Parametric equivalence / non-inferiority testWithin-subject repeated-measures design
开创性文献Schuirmann, D.J. (1987). A Comparison of the Two One-Sided Tests Procedure and the Power Approach. Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics, 15(6), 657–680. link ↗Senn, S. (2002). Cross-over Trials in Clinical Research (2nd ed.). Wiley. ISBN: 978-0471496533
别名non-inferiority trial, bioequivalence study, active-control trial, Denklik ve Üstünlük Olmayan Çalışma (Equivalence / Non-Inferiority)within-subject crossover, cross-over design, AB/BA design, Çapraz Desen (Crossover Design)
相关66
摘要An equivalence or non-inferiority trial is a clinical study design that tests whether a new intervention is clinically equivalent to, or no worse than, an established standard by a pre-specified margin. Codified in Schuirmann's 1987 Two One-Sided Tests (TOST) framework and embedded in EMA and FDA regulatory guidance, this design is the regulatory standard for generic drug approval and medical device testing.A crossover design is an experimental design in which each participant receives all treatments under investigation, but in a different sequence and across separate time periods. Each subject thus acts as their own control, which substantially reduces between-subject variability and allows efficient treatment comparisons with smaller sample sizes. The approach has been central to clinical pharmacology and comparative research since the mid-20th century, with foundational methodology codified by Senn (2002) and Jones & Kenward (2014).
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Equivalence / Non-Inferiority Trial · Crossover Design. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare