ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

动态匹配估计量×倾向得分匹配×
领域因果推断研究统计学
方法族Regression modelProcess / pipeline
起源年份20101983
提出者Lechner & Miquel (2010); building on Heckman, Ichimura & Todd (1998)Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
类型Nonparametric causal inference / matchingMethod
开创性文献Lechner, M., & Miquel, R. (2010). Identification of the effects of dynamic treatments by sequential conditional independence assumptions. Empirical Economics, 39(1), 111-137. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
别名dynamic treatment matching, sequential matching estimator, dynamic selection-on-observables, DMEPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
相关63
摘要The Dynamic Matching Estimator extends standard matching methods to settings where treatment is assigned sequentially over multiple periods. Instead of a single treatment decision, units receive or forgo treatment at each time point, and the estimator identifies causal effects of entire treatment histories by matching on time-varying covariates and past treatment paths, under sequential conditional independence assumptions.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Dynamic Matching Estimator · Propensity Score Matching. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare