ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

动态模糊断点回归设计×动态双重差分×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份2001-20102021
提出者Cellini, Ferreira & Rothstein (dynamic RDD, 2010); Hahn, Todd & Van der Klaauw (fuzzy RDD foundations, 2001)Callaway & Sant'Anna; Sun & Abraham
类型Quasi-experimental causal inferenceCausal inference / quasi-experimental
开创性文献Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615-635. DOI ↗Callaway, B., & Sant'Anna, P. H. C. (2021). Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 200-230. DOI ↗
别名Dynamic Fuzzy RDD, DFRD, Time-varying Fuzzy RD, Dynamic Fuzzy RD DesignDynamic DiD, Staggered DiD, Event-time DiD, Heterogeneous-timing DiD
相关44
摘要Dynamic Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity Design extends the standard fuzzy RDD to a panel or multi-period setting, allowing researchers to estimate how the causal effect of a probabilistic threshold-based treatment evolves over time. By combining an IV-based fuzzy first stage with time-indexed outcomes, it traces treatment effects across multiple post-treatment periods, not just at a single cross-sectional snapshot.Dynamic Difference-in-Differences extends the classic DiD framework to settings where units adopt treatment at different times. Rather than collapsing all variation into a single 2x2 comparison, it estimates group-time average treatment effects for each adoption cohort at each calendar period, then aggregates them into interpretable summaries of the causal effect over event time.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Dynamic Fuzzy Regression Discontinuity · Dynamic Difference-in-Differences. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare