方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 文献收集× | 话语分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 调查方法论 | 质性研究 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 19th–20th century historical methods; contemporary social-science codification c. 2000s | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| 提出者≠ | Rooted in historical and social science traditions; systematized by Lindsay Prior and Glenn Bowen | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative / mixed data-collection technique | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | document analysis, documentary method, document review, secondary document analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 3 | 2 |
| 摘要≠ | Document collection is a systematic data-collection technique in which the researcher gathers and reviews existing written, visual, or digital records — such as reports, meeting minutes, policies, letters, photographs, or institutional records — as primary or supplementary evidence. It is widely used in qualitative, historical, and mixed-methods research and can stand alone or complement interviews and observation. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|