ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

文献收集×内容分析×
领域调查方法论质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19th–20th century historical methods; contemporary social-science codification c. 2000sSystematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 2018
提出者Rooted in historical and social science traditions; systematized by Lindsay Prior and Glenn BowenKlaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications research
类型Qualitative / mixed data-collection techniqueQualitative / mixed-method research technique
开创性文献Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661
别名document analysis, documentary method, document review, secondary document analysisİçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysis
相关35
摘要Document collection is a systematic data-collection technique in which the researcher gathers and reviews existing written, visual, or digital records — such as reports, meeting minutes, policies, letters, photographs, or institutional records — as primary or supplementary evidence. It is widely used in qualitative, historical, and mixed-methods research and can stand alone or complement interviews and observation.Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Document Collection · Content Analysis. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare