方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 基于文档的项目评估× | 文献分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 田野方法 | 质性研究 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1960s–1970s (program evaluation field); document review as formal strategy codified in 1980s–1990s | 1920 |
| 提出者≠ | Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi and Howard Freeman (systematic program evaluation tradition) | Max Weber and Karl Mannheim |
| 类型≠ | Evaluation research design | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978-0787908331 | Scott, J. (1990). A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745608419 |
| 别名 | documentary program evaluation, records-based evaluation, document review evaluation, archival program evaluation | documentary analysis, textual analysis, content analysis of documents, archival research |
| 相关≠ | 6 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Document-based program evaluation is a systematic approach to assessing a program's design, implementation, and outcomes using existing documentary evidence — such as policy statements, implementation reports, budgets, meeting minutes, and program artifacts — rather than primary data collection through interviews or observation. It is particularly suited to retrospective evaluations, accountability reviews, and contexts where direct fieldwork is impractical or infeasible. | Document analysis is a systematic qualitative research method for examining written, visual, or audiovisual sources—such as policy documents, historical records, organizational records, media reports, emails, social media posts, photographs, or videos—to extract meaning, identify patterns, and understand social phenomena. Developed by Weber and Mannheim in early 20th-century sociology, the method bridges historical research, content analysis, and textual interpretation. Document analysis is used across disciplines to understand organizational change, policy evolution, media representation, historical events, and cultural meaning. Documents provide evidence of what organizations, institutions, or societies value, decide, and communicate, often revealing contradictions between policy and practice. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|