ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

判别效度×构念效度×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份19591955
提出者Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. FiskeLee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
类型Validity evidence / psychometric evaluationValidity evaluation framework
开创性文献Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗
别名discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validityconstruct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
相关56
摘要Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 Download slides

ScholarGate方法对比: Discriminant Validity · Construct Validity. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare