ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

数字项目评估×数字内容分析×
领域田野方法质性
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2000s–2010s (formalized alongside proliferation of digital programs and online data)1950s (classical); digital adaptation 2000s–2010s
提出者Evolving practice; rooted in Rossi, Lipsey & Freeman's evaluation tradition; extended by digital methods scholars in the 2000s–2010sBuilding on Berelson (1952) and Krippendorff (1980); adapted for digital contexts by Herring (2010) and Neuendorf (2002+)
类型Applied evaluation methodologyQualitative/quantitative hybrid research approach
开创性文献George, S., & Leidner, D. (2020). Digital Evaluation: Leveraging Digital Data and Methods for Program Assessment. Routledge. link ↗Neuendorf, K. A. (2017). The Content Analysis Guidebook (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412979474
别名technology-enhanced evaluation, digital evaluation, e-evaluation, online program evaluationDCA, online content analysis, web content analysis, digital media content analysis
相关54
摘要Digital program evaluation applies the systematic logic of program evaluation to programs that operate fully or partly in digital environments, using digital tools and data — web analytics, online surveys, platform logs, social media metrics, and digital trace data — to assess program reach, implementation fidelity, and outcomes. It retains the core evaluative commitment to rendering a defensible judgment about program merit and worth while exploiting the speed, scale, and granularity that digital data sources offer. Applications span online education, digital public health campaigns, e-government services, and technology-mediated social programs.Digital Content Analysis is a systematic research method for describing, categorising, and interpreting the content of digital materials — social media posts, websites, online forums, blogs, emails, and video transcripts. It applies the rigorous coding logic of classical content analysis to digitally native or digitally collected text, enabling researchers to move from raw online data to structured, interpretable findings about communication, meaning, and social phenomena.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Digital Program Evaluation · Digital Content analysis. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare