方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 数字解释现象学分析× | 数字诠释现象学× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | IPA founded ~1996; digital variant established practice ~2010–2020 | 2000s–2010s (digital adaptation of van Manen's 1990 framework) |
| 提出者≠ | Jonathan A. Smith (IPA); adapted to digital contexts by qualitative internet researchers from ~2010s onward | Grounded in Max van Manen's hermeneutic phenomenology; digital adaptation developed by qualitative researchers from the 2000s onward |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative research design and analytic approach | Qualitative research design |
| 开创性文献≠ | Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Sage. ISBN: 978-1412908344 | van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791404737 |
| 别名 | Digital IPA, online IPA, digital-mediated IPA, internet-based interpretive phenomenological analysis | online hermeneutic phenomenology, digital HP, web-based hermeneutic phenomenology, virtual hermeneutic phenomenology |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Digital Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (Digital IPA) applies the rigorous IPA framework — originally developed by Jonathan Smith to explore how individuals make sense of significant lived experiences — within digital data-collection environments. Participants are recruited and interviewed online (via video call, synchronous text chat, email, or digital diary), and the resulting transcripts and digital texts are analysed through the same close-reading, emergent-coding, and cross-case patterning procedures that define standard IPA. The digital setting both expands access to geographically dispersed or hard-to-reach participants and introduces distinct methodological considerations around rapport, embodied cues, and data authenticity. | Digital Hermeneutic Phenomenology applies van Manen's hermeneutic phenomenological tradition to phenomena that are lived, shaped, or mediated through digital technologies and online environments. Rather than treating the digital channel as a mere convenience for data collection, this approach treats participants' online experiences as phenomena worthy of interpretive inquiry in their own right — asking what it means to live, relate, learn, or work in and through digital spaces. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|