ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

数字制度民族志×文献分析×
领域质性质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份IE: 1980s–1990s; digital adaptation: 2000s–2010s1920
提出者Dorothy E. Smith (IE foundations); extended by IE scholars to digital contextsMax Weber and Karl Mannheim
类型Qualitative research designMethod
开创性文献Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759105010Scott, J. (1990). A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745608419
别名Digital IE, online institutional ethnography, virtual institutional ethnography, digital Smith IEdocumentary analysis, textual analysis, content analysis of documents, archival research
相关64
摘要Digital Institutional Ethnography (Digital IE) applies Dorothy E. Smith's institutional ethnography framework to digital and online settings. It investigates how institutional ruling relations — the texts, policies, and coordination mechanisms that organize people's everyday lives — operate through digital infrastructures such as platforms, software systems, online documents, and algorithmic processes. The goal is to make visible how digital tools and texts coordinate and subordinate experience to institutional interests.Document analysis is a systematic qualitative research method for examining written, visual, or audiovisual sources—such as policy documents, historical records, organizational records, media reports, emails, social media posts, photographs, or videos—to extract meaning, identify patterns, and understand social phenomena. Developed by Weber and Mannheim in early 20th-century sociology, the method bridges historical research, content analysis, and textual interpretation. Document analysis is used across disciplines to understand organizational change, policy evolution, media representation, historical events, and cultural meaning. Documents provide evidence of what organizations, institutions, or societies value, decide, and communicate, often revealing contradictions between policy and practice.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Digital Institutional Ethnography · Document Analysis. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare