方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 数字教育行动研究× | 项目评估× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 田野方法 | 田野方法 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1990s–2000s (digital integration of Lewinian action research traditions) | 1960s–1970s (Scriven 1967; Stufflebeam CIPP model 1971) |
| 提出者≠ | Rooted in Carr & Kemmis (1986); digital adaptation developed by Lankshear, Knobel, and others from mid-1990s onward | Michael Scriven; Daniel Stufflebeam; Peter Rossi |
| 类型≠ | Applied qualitative-cyclical research design | Applied evaluation methodology |
| 开创性文献≠ | Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2004). A Handbook for Teacher Research: From Design to Implementation. Open University Press. ISBN: 978-0335211357 | Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0761908944 |
| 别名 | technology-integrated action research, online educational action research, digital-mediated practitioner inquiry, DEAR | evaluation research, program assessment, educational evaluation, systematic program evaluation |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | Digital educational action research is a cyclical, practitioner-led inquiry method in which educators systematically investigate a problem or question arising in digitally mediated teaching and learning environments. Drawing on the action research tradition of Carr, Kemmis, and Lewin, it integrates digital tools — learning management systems, social media, video, online collaborative platforms — both as the context of inquiry and as instruments for data collection, making it particularly suited to contemporary technology-rich classrooms. | Program evaluation is a systematic, empirically grounded process of collecting and analyzing information about a program to determine its merit, worth, or significance. Applied across education, public health, social services, and policy, it addresses questions such as whether a program is reaching its target population, whether it is being implemented as designed, and whether it is producing the intended outcomes. It draws on both quantitative and qualitative methods and serves accountability, improvement, or knowledge-generation purposes. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|