ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

数字文献分析×文献分析×
领域质性质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份2000s onward (grounded in earlier document analysis traditions)1920
提出者Adapted from traditional document analysis; digital variant developed by qualitative researchers across disciplines (e.g., Bowen 2009; Prior 2003)Max Weber and Karl Mannheim
类型Qualitative data analysis methodMethod
开创性文献Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗Scott, J. (1990). A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745608419
别名online document analysis, digital text analysis, e-document analysis, digital archival analysisdocumentary analysis, textual analysis, content analysis of documents, archival research
相关64
摘要Digital document analysis is a qualitative method for systematically locating, appraising, and interpreting documents that exist in digital or online form — including websites, emails, institutional reports, policy files, social media content, and digital archives. It applies the established logic of document analysis to born-digital and digitised sources, enabling researchers to examine meaning, discourse, and institutional practice embedded in contemporary digital texts without recruiting participants.Document analysis is a systematic qualitative research method for examining written, visual, or audiovisual sources—such as policy documents, historical records, organizational records, media reports, emails, social media posts, photographs, or videos—to extract meaning, identify patterns, and understand social phenomena. Developed by Weber and Mannheim in early 20th-century sociology, the method bridges historical research, content analysis, and textual interpretation. Document analysis is used across disciplines to understand organizational change, policy evolution, media representation, historical events, and cultural meaning. Documents provide evidence of what organizations, institutions, or societies value, decide, and communicate, often revealing contradictions between policy and practice.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 Download slides

ScholarGate方法对比: Digital Document Analysis · Document Analysis. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare